home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sojourn1.sojourn.com!not-for-mail
- From: mharrell@sojourn1.sojourn.com (Matt Harrell)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: SCSI vs. EIDE
- Date: 21 Jan 1996 02:55:50 GMT
- Organization: Sojourn Systems. Lansing, MI (USA)
- Message-ID: <4ds9vm$ouh@tkhut.sojourn.com>
- References: <4dlv8s$mn9@tkhut.sojourn.com> <199601191732.MAA03972@misl.mcp.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sojourn1.sojourn.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 941216BETA PL0]
-
- justin@misl.ucs.indiana.edu wrote:
-
- : No, two channel EIDE can handle four
-
- Even so, the point is still logically valid. EIDE *can* handle 4
- (i.e., EIDE is not *necessarily*limited to 2). Not that this means
- anything; SCSI still handles considerably more.
-
- Matt Harrell
-